Using AI in SR&ED Claims: Benefits and Risks

Using AI in SR&ED Claims: Benefits and Risks

Generative AI tools offer significant potential in improving the efficiency and consistency of drafting Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) claims. These claims are central to securing tax incentives for businesses engaged in SR&ED. They require a detailed and compliant submission to meet the Canadian Revenue Agency’s (CRA) specific guidelines. While AI can assist in many areas, it also introduces several risks, particularly around compliance, accuracy, and data security.

Benefits of Using AI for SR&ED

1. Increased Efficiency and Time Savings. AI can automate routine tasks such as formatting, structuring, and organizing claim documentation. This reduces the time spent on administrative tasks, allowing technical staff to focus on more critical aspects of the claim. Validating experimental data and ensuring compliance is a key component to a successful SR&ED claim.
2. Enhanced Consistency and Standardization. AI can standardize the formatting and language used across multiple claims, ensuring uniformity and compliance with CRA preferences. This is particularly helpful for organizations with multiple SR&ED claims or larger teams working on claim preparation.
3. Assistance with Technical Language. AI can support claimants by suggesting the right technical language to describe experiments, methodologies, and technological advancements. This is valuable for teams that lack in-house expertise in drafting claims in a way that aligns with CRA expectations.
4. Error Reduction. AI tools can help catch routine errors such as typos, formatting inconsistencies, or even basic compliance issues. Automated proofreading and formatting can improve the overall professionalism of the claim before submission.

Risks of Using AI for SR&ED

1. Lack of Contextual Understanding. The CRA’s SR&ED guidelines are highly specific, requiring a deep understanding of the technical and experimental nature of the work. AI may struggle to distinguish between routine engineering and eligible experimental development. This could potentially lead to overclaiming or misrepresentation of activities that don’t meet the CRA’s criteria. This could result in audits or claim rejection.
2. Potential for Generic Language. AI-generated text is often broad and generalized, which can be problematic when preparing SR&ED claims that need detailed, technical descriptions. The CRA requires precise language to describe experimental challenges, uncertainties, and systematic investigation. Generic wording may make the claim appear too vague, affecting its credibility.
3. Missing Key Eligibility Criteria. The CRA evaluates SR&ED claims based on specific criteria, such as technological advancement and evidence of experimentation. AI may inadvertently overlook or inadequately address these requirements. This can lead to incomplete or improperly structured claims that could be flagged for further scrutiny.

Moreover, using AI tools for SR&ED claim preparation can introduce several security risks, particularly related to confidentiality, data ownership, and compliance with data protection standards.

Key security risks to consider​

1. Exposure of Proprietary or Sensitive Information: SR&ED claims often involve highly sensitive information about proprietary technology, experimental methods, intellectual property (IP), and trade secrets. When using AI platforms, especially cloud-based or online ones, there’s a risk that this sensitive information could be exposed to unauthorized parties. Many AI tools process data externally on shared servers, making it possible for proprietary information to be inadvertently stored or accessed by the AI provider or other parties.​
2. Unclear Data Ownership and Control: Some AI providers may store input data for model training or other uses unless explicitly stated otherwise in their privacy policies. This creates a risk of losing ownership control over proprietary data once it’s submitted to the AI platform, potentially allowing the provider to retain or even use the data under certain terms. This is especially concerning for organizations that need to maintain tight control over IP and confidential R&D data.​
3. Compliance with Data Protection and Privacy Regulations: The handling of SR&ED data, especially if it includes personal or sensitive information (e.g., employee names, experimental details), must comply with data protection regulations like Canada’s PIPEDA, the GDPR (for EU-related data), and other local privacy laws. Many AI providers are based outside Canada, potentially storing data across borders, which could create legal complications or compliance risks, especially if the AI provider’s data practices do not align with these regulatory standards.​
4. Lack of Encryption and Secure Data Transfer: If data is transferred to and from AI platforms without sufficient encryption, it’s vulnerable to interception by unauthorized parties. Secure data transfer methods and end-to-end encryption are critical for protecting sensitive SR&ED information from cyberattacks during transmission, but not all AI platforms offer robust encryption or secure transfer options.​
5. Model Inference and Data Leakage: Some AI models, especially large language models, have been known to unintentionally “leak” data they were trained on. This could mean that, in some cases, input data could inadvertently influence the model’s future responses. For instance, if a proprietary method or technical detail is processed by the AI, there’s a slight risk it could surface in responses given to other users, posing a threat to IP confidentiality.​
6. Inadequate Access Controls and Authentication: If an AI platform lacks robust access control mechanisms, unauthorized individuals could potentially access the platform and view sensitive SR&ED data. This is especially risky in cases where multiple users from an organization are accessing the same AI service without clear authentication processes, or where the AI service lacks multi-factor authentication or other secure login practices.​​

Mitigating Risks of AI and SR&ED

While AI can improve the efficiency of SR&ED claims preparation, it cannot replace the need for expert oversight. A claim must reflect the true experimental nature of the work and adhere to CRA requirements, making expert review critical. Moreover, businesses should address potential security risks by carefully choosing AI platforms with strong data protection features. Secure, on-premise AI solutions or platforms with encryption and clear data handling policies should be prioritized. Limiting the amount of sensitive information shared with AI tools can further mitigate the risk of data leaks.

Conclusion

Best Used as a Supplement, Not a Replacement. While AI can provide significant support, the complexities of SR&ED claims require human oversight to ensure compliance with CRA guidelines. Combining AI tools with expert review allows claimants to benefit from efficiency gains without compromising the accuracy and compliance essential for SR&ED claim success. Combining AI’s capabilities with expert review ensures compliant and accurate claims while minimizing the risk of data security breaches. For a closer look at the complexity of SR&ED claims, check out our article Complex SR&ED Disputes: Procedures in Tax Court

Connect With Us! 

Share your thoughts by commenting below or joining the conversation on our LinkedIn page, Facebook page, or via Twitter.